<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Films @ Dave's Info Cafe &#187; Film Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://films.davesinfocafe.com/category/film-sound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://films.davesinfocafe.com</link>
	<description>Random observations on movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:09:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Westerns &#8211; Part 3 &#8211; Easterns</title>
		<link>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/westerns-part-3-easterns/</link>
		<comments>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/westerns-part-3-easterns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Criticism and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Directing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fistful of dollars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kurosawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[once upon a time in the west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segio leone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sergio corbucci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaghetti westerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the great silence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the magnificent seven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westerns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://films.davesinfocafe.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Ford&#8217;s westerns have influenced so many directors throughout the world so it was not so much of a surprise when &#8220;westerns&#8221; started being made outside the Hollywood system.
The most famous mutation of the traditional western was the spaghetti western. These were films made largely in Europe (Spain being the most believable location to double [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Ford&#8217;s westerns have influenced so many directors throughout the world so it was not so much of a surprise when &#8220;westerns&#8221; started being made outside the Hollywood system.</p>
<p>The most famous mutation of the traditional western was the spaghetti western. These were films made largely in Europe (Spain being the most believable location to double as Arizona or Texas) by Italians mainly that created an identifiable sub genre with its own characteristics.</p>
<p>Important directors on the world stage came out of this movement such as Sergio Leone and Bernardo Bertolucci. Leone put his case forward as one of the world&#8217;s great directors with such films as the Fistful of Dollars trilogy and Once upon a Time in the West, a candidate for the greatest western of all time. Bertolucci, at this stage in his career was involved as a scriptwriter for Leone and emerged later on as a fine director in his own right outside the western genre.</p>
<p>There were scores of spaghetti westerns made during the period 1965-1980. They were recognisable for their stylistic differences to the traditional westerns. In particular, the use of closeups of the characters&#8217; expressive faces usually dripping with sweat or smoking a cigarette before an explosively violent scene ramped up the tension in these westerns. The villains were colourful and hideous and psychopathic. No horrific act was out of their range. They even made that Hollywood western stalwart, Henry Fonda, into a steely-eyed child killer in the epic Once Upon a Time in the West.</p>
<p>Heroes were not the archetypal heroes of old westerns. They were much more complex. More like anti heroes. Clint Eastwood&#8217;s Man With No Name in the Fistful of Dollars trilogy typifies this. He is probably the least disagreeable character in the film but is no angel himself. In Once Upon  a Time in the West the main protagonists are symbols more than characters telling the painful story of the opening up of the west. None is without sin but there is a chance of redemption by the end for some of them.</p>
<p>Spaghetti westerns are violent and sometimes unpredictable interms of plot and ending. One notable example of this is The Great Silence directed by Sergio Corbucci. It is sometimes referred to as the Alpine western with its backdrop of mountains and snow and is a very dark tale with a completely miserable ending. No heroes riding off into the sunset here. Very little light relief during the film aswell. Italian directors were definitiely experimenting with stories, characters and visuals to create unique films that could still be called westerns.</p>
<p>No self-respecting spaghetti western was complete without a quirky yet mesmerising soundtrack from Ennio Morricone that emphasised the difference between this western and the traditional Hollywood western. Sometimes beautiful and evocative, sometimes downright irritating, Morricone&#8217;s soundtracks make the spaghetti westerns even more distinctive.</p>
<p>The western was also influenced from further east, Japan. Hollywood film makers saw the upsurge of spaghetti westerns and knew they would have to up their game. So they looked for new storylines and John Sturges used Kurosawa&#8217;s Seven Samurai as the template for The Magnificent Seven. Both of these films were successful in their own genre. Leone used the basic plot of Yojimbo directed by Kurosawa as his base line for A Fistful of Dollars. And yet Kurosawa openly acknowledged his regard for John Ford&#8217;s westerns. So chicken&#8230; egg?</p>
<p>Despite all the critical acclaim given to westerns, all was not well. By the mid 1980s the western was dead as a genre. Nobody was making significant western films. What happened? I&#8217;ll talk about that next time.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=088b86ba-0150-896b-8cf4-0b7d366294ef" alt="" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/westerns-part-3-easterns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southern Comfort</title>
		<link>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/southern-comfort/</link>
		<comments>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/southern-comfort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Criticism and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Directing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cajuns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keith carradine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisianna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powers Boothe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Comfort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Hill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://films.davesinfocafe.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often I see a film on TV that I remember from long ago that surprises me. Southern Comfort is one such film that I feel is a hidden gem. Not only has it got much to offer cinematically speaking but it has balls and attitude.
Southern Comfort is a film that follows the (ultimately [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every so often I see a film on TV that I remember from long ago that surprises me. Southern Comfort is one such film that I feel is a hidden gem. Not only has it got much to offer cinematically speaking but it has balls and attitude.</p>
<p>Southern Comfort is a film that follows the (ultimately tragic) exploits of a troop of National Guardsmen on a training exercise in the swamps of Lousianna as they upset some local Cajun hunters and pay a shockingly high price for their misdemeanours.</p>
<p>The troop is a standard mix of rednecks, loners and bureaucrats who are better at warring with themselves than the enemy. There are no big stars just an ensemble of excellent character actors &#8211; Keith Carradine, Fred Ward and Powers Boothe most notably &#8211; who carry the story forward in a believable fashion. Tension abounds from the beginning as the disparate troop argues and fights within itself. A tragic encounter with some local Cajun hunters leaves them fighting for their lives as they become the prey.</p>
<p>The tone is set from the start as the beautifully evocative slide guitar soundtrack by Ry Cooder creates a mood of foreboding and alienation, something tragic is coming our way. (He does something similar in Paris, Texas). This complements the stunning cinematography of the swamps creating an oppressively claustrophobic stage for the action to be played out. Its timeless and directionless and alien to the city boys in the troop. All the troop wants to do is get outta there but which way?</p>
<p>The director is Walter Hill, a director most famous at this point for his controversially violent film The Warriors which traces the attempts of an urban gang to get back to their own turf across town. During the film they have to cross other gangs&#8217; turf and survive to reach their goal. One could argue that Southern Comfort is a grown up riff on that story with the troop entering (and messing with) Cajun territory. Certainly the violence meted out is quite graphic and resonant with the Warriors. But there are more levels to the film than that. It can be seen as a post Vietnam analysis of the USA, a country with lots of divisions and arguments and opinions and attitudes struggling to come to terms with resolving conflict. It could be seen as an allegory of Vietnam itself with an arrogant army going into an alien landscape and coming up against a very different culture and getting a very bloody nose.</p>
<p>The ending is not surprising in what happens but the way that it happens. The two remaining survivors of the troop eventually come across a Cajun village. Up until now the Cajuns have been represented by the partially seen hunters. Now we see the Cajun everyday life of the village and the hospitality afforded to the troopers. Nevertheless the troopers are wary discovering that the hunters have returned to the village to finish them off. So after a game of cat and mouse they fight and kill the hunters and hobble off down the road out of the village until they meet an army vehicle.</p>
<p>The peculiar thing for me about this ending is that the film seems to be saying that Cajuns are not all bloodthirsty killers by portraying the village life and the obvious enjoyment. It could also be saying that the Cajun everyday life is a warm and cuddly myth because when the fight for survival in the village begins everything carries on as if nothing is happening! No one seems to be perturbed about shots being fired and the troopers obviously sustaining knife wounds. What does that say about the local populace? Mixed messages I think and puzzling to me any way.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, in the final analysis it is a gripping action thriller with overtones of so much more and whilst not getting into the great film category Southern Comfort has much to commend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/southern-comfort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atonement &#8211; Post Script</title>
		<link>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/atonement-post-script/</link>
		<comments>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/atonement-post-script/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Criticism and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Directing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atonement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian McKewan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary references]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://films.davesinfocafe.com/137/atonement-post-script/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I did watch it again with my wife this time. It is a film that bears watching again and I appreciated much more the good points of the film. However, I still stand by my comments about the ending.
The beginning scenes give you all the clues to the film in a really cinematic way. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I did watch it again with my wife this time. It is a film that bears watching again and I appreciated much more the good points of the film. However, I still stand by my comments about the ending.</p>
<p>The beginning scenes give you all the clues to the film in a really cinematic way. The ambiguous opening shot of the country mansion pulls back to reveal a doll&#8217;s house. Nothing is really as it seems. The scenes repeated from different points of view. The typewriter clack on the soundtrack morphing into the music. Very much literary references. And one of the things I missed but my wife picked up on quickly &#8211; the relationship between Robbie and Cecilia. Nothing is said in the narrative but again the clues are there. Robbie, the lowly cook&#8217;s son has been financed in his education by the now dead head of the household and his mother&#8217;s assertion that Robbie was &#8220;nothing like his father&#8221; suggest that there has been a liaison in the past between the master and the cook that produced Robbie. So maybe there is more of the forbidden love element than I originally thought with Robbie and Cecilia being related. Incestuous goings on amongst the gentry &#8211; that wouldn&#8217;t do!</p>
<p>One element of the film that my wife and I both agreed could have been improved was the sound quality. As most of the dialogue was fast and of the Noel Coward variety, clear sound was essential but we kept missing key lines in the film and having to ask each other what did they just say.</p>
<p>I watched the final half hour carefully again and still feel duped. The director Joe Wright may retort that you were warned during the first half of the film that things were not as they seem. So, why were you not sceptical about the latter scenes in the hospital and the scene at Cecilia&#8217;s flat? My response would be that there were no obvious clues in these scenes as there had been in previous scenes. Deliberately so to make the ending that much more unexpected. I was interpreting it as straight forward narrative and genre. A sneaky trick.</p>
<p>The final confessional by the dying Briony I understood better her arguments but I still say that it was a weak gesture that would mean nothing to anyone except her. Atonement, to me, means acknowledging your mistakes, your sins, and trying your best to put them right. Her tragedy was that she could not put them right for Robbie and Cecilia in real life. But she could have confessed to Robbie&#8217;s mother. She could have done the same to her mother (although we are told that the episode had been swept under the carpet). But she didn&#8217;t and what she did was far little too late and comes across as self serving only. She could have lived with her conscience after confessing better but might have had to endure the wrath or anger of real people still alive. Instead she retreats into a fictional world of &#8220;what might have been&#8221; for what seems to have been the rest of her life. Maybe that was her penance for her dreadful act. Penance &#8211; now that would have been a better title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/atonement-post-script/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Band&#8217;s Last Waltz</title>
		<link>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/the-bands-last-waltz/</link>
		<comments>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/the-bands-last-waltz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob dylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doucmentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin scorcese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the band]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://films.davesinfocafe.com/124/the-bands-last-waltz/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m on a roll now. The Song Remains The Same just started me thinking again about pop music films again. It&#8217;s funny how one thing leads to another. I&#8217;d almost forgotten about probably the greatest film about popular music and culture. And it was made by a bone fide film maker with a host of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on a roll now. The Song Remains The Same just started me thinking again about pop music films again. It&#8217;s funny how one thing leads to another. I&#8217;d almost forgotten about probably the greatest film about popular music and culture. And it was made by a bone fide film maker with a host of cinematic as well as musical talent.</p>
<p>The Last Waltz is a film documentary by Martin Scorcese based around the final(?) gig of The Band, that legendary but cultish rock band, that became famous through being Bob Dylan&#8217;s backing band for a while. The film came out only two years later than The Song Remains The Same yet as films they are poles apart.</p>
<p>The Band were more legends in the American music industry rather than world wide famous rock stars. Their pedigree was impeccable, they were killer live performers and they commanded respect amongst their peers. Their friends numbered among the royalty of the 1970s American music scene. Individually, they were not household names like Led Zeppelin or The Who. But together they created a small phenomonen.</p>
<p>Martin Scorcese obviously was a fan and he conducts several interviews personally with The Band about their career. But the main event is the concert footage with guest appearances by Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Van Morrison, Eric Clapton, Dr John and countless others. Not only is the sound reproduction high quality as is the camerwork and lighting but there is a great feeling of celebration in the performances. Judicial use of editing makes the action always interesting. Scorcese displays the concert footage in its best light and highlights the variety of musical styles on display with The Band accompanying the musical guests on many of the songs. It&#8217;s almost like you&#8217;re there. There are no great stylistic cinematic tricks to distract you from the performances.</p>
<p>The film is worth watching as a historical document and shows a slice of the 1970s American music scene with many of its movers and shakers but for me it&#8217;s all about the music. No pyrotechnics, no real myth making agenda just a record of high quality music for the sake of it. Beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/the-bands-last-waltz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Song Remains The Same</title>
		<link>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/the-song-remains-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/the-song-remains-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[led zeppelin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock documentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://films.davesinfocafe.com/121/the-song-remains-the-same/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought I just had to write this piece after having watched The Song Remains The Same on television last night. You probably realise by now that one of my areas of interest is films or movies about popular music and culture. When I saw that this was on the TV last night the closet Led [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I just had to write this piece after having watched The Song Remains The Same on television last night. You probably realise by now that one of my areas of interest is films or movies about popular music and culture. When I saw that this was on the TV last night the closet Led Zeppelin fan in me came to life briefly. I had never seen the film before (strangely) and had almost forgotten about its existence. So I watched it with some anticipation. With all the hoohaa about Led Zeppelin&#8217;s reunion gig around Christmas I wasn&#8217;t surprised that this surfaced.</p>
<p>In summary The Song Remains The Same documents the Led Zeppelin gig at Madison Square in New York and was released in 1976 when the group were at their zenith. It is interspersed with various dream-like sequences I assume were meant to be representations of the personality of the members of the band. There are also gritty sequences of the hard-nosed manager and his cronies taking the stadium management to task with copious amounts of adult language. As the film was financed entirely by the band it is safe to say that the overall effect is to try and extend the myth of Led Zeppelin. It is designed to make you think that there is more to the band than there actually is. As the camera looks into the crowd you get the feeling that they are mesmerised by the presence of the band. This isn&#8217;t just a gig but a religious experience. An alternative explanation is that the looks of love and awe were chemically induced!</p>
<p>My overall impression of the film is that of variable quality in both the movie sense and music sense. There are some moments in the film that are absolutely electric, during the concert footage, where you can understand why they were hailed as the best band in the world. The opening &#8211; Rock and Roll &#8211; gets things off to a tremendous start and many of the more famous riff-based songs fare well. But they do retreat into the more self indulgent, long versions of various songs that was symptomatic of that &#8220;progressive&#8221; era which can be a big yawn after a while. More jazz than rock. Maybe that&#8217;s why there are the dream sequences which tend to be played over an extended solo in the concert. However, Stairway To Heaven does provide one of the highpoints. There is more than a little technical proficiency and panache in Jimmy Page&#8217;s guitar work but he tries to prove it time and time again. But I guess that this is what fans expected at the time and much of the filming is based around close ups of Page playing his guitar and posing. However, he is outgunned in the posing department by the lion-haired, lead singer Robert Plant who stands and wiggles his hips in an almost effeminate posture before unleashing his powerful and unique voice.</p>
<p>The film can be magnificent and irritating at the same time. I can&#8217;t help but compare it to The Kids Are Alright with The Who. Kids has a vibrant energy as a film and a record of performances that The Song&#8230; only reaches in small segments. But there are large parts of The Song&#8230; when it just seems a bit too pretentious and a bit too much like fodder for the Spinal Tap script. I am still a fan of the music but I can&#8217;t buy into the Led Zeppelin myth. Having read many reports of their live gigs over the years it seems they tended to be a bit hit and miss as a live band (although the Madison Square Garden performance was very good). So when you see that 20 million people tried to get tickets for the reunion gig I find that a bit surprising. But I am an old cynic and all the myth building in the intervening years has clearly done its job to herald the return of the rock messiahs. I am sure that The Song Remains The Same has also played its part in this process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://films.davesinfocafe.com/the-song-remains-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
